Legal Opinion

Appeal of City of Bethlehem v. City of Bethlehem

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 17, 1976No. Appeal, No. 170 Misc. DktPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Crumlish, Jr.,

City of Bethlehem (Appellant) seeks review of an award of an arbitrator pursuant to Pa. R.J.A. No. 2101. Appellant alleges that it “does not possess the legal authority to include a provision in the collective bargaining agreement requiring that all unresolved disputes under the terms of the collective bargaining agreement be submitted to arbitration” and “[e]ven if the Arbitrator had jurisdiction to render his award, the same did not draw its essence from the basic agreement.”

In Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission v. Sanders & Thomas, 461 Pa. 420, 426, 336 A.2d…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United Steelworkers v. Enterprise Wheel & Car Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. Ludwig Honold Mfg. Co. v. Harold A. Fletcher and United Automobile Workers, Local 416Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1969
  3. Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission v. Sanders & Thomas, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  4. International Brotherhood of Firemen & Oilers, AFL-CIO Local 1201 v. School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  5. Teamsters Local Union No. 77 v. Pennsylvania Turnpike CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. County of Lackawanna v. Service Employees' International UnionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API