Legal Opinion

Teamsters Local Union No. 77 v. Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 5, 1975No. Appeal, No. 1004 C.D. 1973PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

President Judge Bowman,

On November 25, 1972, at about 4:30 a.m., an employee (Ms. X) of the Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission (appellee) was allegedly observed making love to a *240turnpike patron while on duty. The alleged incident occurred inside the tollbooth to which Ms. X was assigned. By letter dated November 29, 1972, Ms. X was informed by appellee’s personnel director that her services had been terminated as of the date of her alleged amorous adventure. Pursuant to the provisions of the collective bargaining agreement then extant between her union, Teamsters Local Union No. 77…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United Steelworkers v. Enterprise Wheel & Car Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. Ludwig Honold Mfg. Co. v. Harold A. Fletcher and United Automobile Workers, Local 416Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1969
  3. Community College v. Community CollegeCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Dover v. Philadelphia Housing AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. County of Franklin v. American Federation of StateCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  3. County of Allegheny v. Allegheny County Prison Employees Independent UnionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  4. Brownsville Area School District v. Brownsville Education Ass'nCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  5. In re Arbitration Between Ringgold Area School DistrictCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API