Quig v. Mutual Inv. Corp.

FLY, O. J.

This is a suit on a promissory note for $1,578.16, secured by a lien on a certain automobile.’ The cause was tried by the court without a'jury, and judgment was rendered against Quig and bis sureties on a certain replevy bond for $1,420.78, and tbe lien was foreclosed on the automobile.

There is no statement of facts, and the sole complaint is against the judgment rendered against E. M. Hays and Stephen Bet-tley, as sureties, on the ground that a judgment cannot be legally rendered against sureties on a replevin bond when a lien is foreclosed on the replevied property. This is…