Federal Trust Co. v. Ost
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Per curiam
The subject-matter of the appeal is succinctly stated as follows in the brief for appellants (there was no oral argument) : “Vice-Chancellor Stein concluded that there was an intestacy as to the unitemized fifteen per cent., and a further intestacy as to the ten per cent, given to Louis Ost, Sr.” (who predeceased the testator). “Appellants contend (1) that there is no intestacy as to the unitemized fifteen per cent., and (2) that there is no intestacy as to the ten per cent, given to Louis Ost, Sr.” '
A careful reading and consideration of the ease and briefs, and of the opinions in the court…
2Cited by9 opinions
- Barrett v. BarrettNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1943
- Glover v. ReynoldsNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1944
- Williams v. GoochMississippi Supreme Court · 1950
- Brooklyn Trust Co. v. DaisNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1937
- Montclair Trust Company v. LupherNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1957
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.