Legal Opinion

Continental Assur. Co. v. Kountz

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 21, 1984No. 82-793PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This appeal arises from a suit filed by Mrs. Freddie Kountz against Continental Assurance Company in which Kountz sought damages for Continental's failure to pay an insurance claim. Continental appeals from the entry of judgment on a jury verdict of $23,000.00 in favor of the plaintiff.

The case arose from the following facts:

Plaintiff Freddie Kountz was insured by defendant Continental as a beneficiary on her husband Dominick Kountz's group health and accident policy, which he obtained through his employer, Grady Buick, Inc., of Mobile. The written insurance policy delineates limitations on…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. National SEC. Fire & Cas. Co. v. BowenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1982
  2. Chavers v. National SEC. Fire & Cas. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1981
  3. National Sav. Life Ins. Co. v. DuttonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1982
  4. Gulf Atlantic Life Ins. Co. v. BarnesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1981
  5. Ritch v. WaldropSupreme Court of Alabama · 1982

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Transportation Insurance Co. v. MorielTexas Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. SladeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1999
  3. EMPLOYEES'BENEFIT ASS'N v. GrissettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1998
  4. Aetna Life Ins. Co. v. LavoieSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987
  5. Thomas v. Principal Financial GroupSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API