Wert v. Phillips
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Burch, J.:
The principal question involved in these appeals is whether an alleged oral contract with deceased parties was established by evidence which should have been regarded as clear and satisfactory as a matter of law. The trial court ruled that the evidence was insufficient to support any contract. The appellant contends that such court either decided the case upon an incorrect conception of the law or acted arbitrarily in refusing to follow all of the adequate competent evidence introduced.
The two cases were consolidated for trial and also upon…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Edson v. . ParsonsNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
- Anderson v. AndersonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1907
- Bichel v. OliverSupreme Court of Kansas · 1908
- Woltz v. First Trust Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1932
- Gibbs v. Central Surety & InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1947
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- In Re Estate of GoffSupreme Court of Kansas · 1963
- In Re Estate of IsomSupreme Court of Kansas · 1964
- In Re Estate of RobertsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1963
- In Re Estate of WintersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1964
- Andreae v. Fourth National BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1960
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.