Legal Opinion

Hotel Associates, Inc. v. Manhattan Bowery Projects

Civil Court of the City of New York

Decided June 3, 1982Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

David B. Saxe, J.

Is an alcoholism treatment center located in a Bowery skid-row hotel that has provided comprehensive therapeutic, medical and counseling services free of charge to its residents, most of whom are chronic alcoholics, a “required service” under the Code of the Metropolitan Hotel Industry Stabilization Association, Inc. (METHISA)?

If it is, then the landlord, who is prohibited under section 61 of the METHISA Code from unilaterally reducing required services, will be required to continue to maintain such an alcoholic treatment center at the hotel.

Two of my…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. MATTER OF GUARDIAN LIFE INS. CO. v. ChapmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1951
  2. People v. PooleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1973
  3. Sommer v. PrinceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
  4. Saljen Realty Corp. v. Human Resources Administration Crisis Intervention ServicesCivil Court of the City of New York · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API