Legal Opinion

Roark v. Bauer

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided February 8, 1960No. Civ. No. 35504PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KALBFLEISCH, District Judge.

This is an action for damages for personal injuries arising out of an automobile accident in Tennessee. Plaintiff is a resident of Colorado and defendants, husband and wife, reside in Toledo, Ohio, in the Western Division of this District.

Defendants have filed a motion to dismiss, or, in the alternative, to transfer this case to the Western Division, either for improper venue under 28 U.S.C.A.' § 1393(a), or for the convenience of parties under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1404(a).

Applicable Statutes

28 U.S.C.A.:

Section 1391

“(a) A civil action wherein jurisdiction is founded only…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Commercial Casualty Insurance v. Consolidated Stone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1929
  2. Duval v. BathrickDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1940
  3. Lavietes v. Ferro Stamping & Mfg. Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1937
  4. Barfield v. Zenith Tire & Rubber Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1924

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Weiss v. York HospitalCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
  2. Weiss v. York HospitalCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
  3. Theresa Rey v. City of Fredericktown, Missouri, a Municipal Corporation Jerry Umfleet, City Marshal of Fredericktown, and George DespainCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984
  4. Henderson v. Wyeth Laboratories, Inc.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1970
  5. Manning v. MundockDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API