Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Lavietes v. Ferro Stamping & Mfg. Co.

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided June 29, 1937No. 592PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TUTTLE, District Judge.

The plaintiff is a resident of the state of New York. There are eleven defendants. Four are Michigan corporations having their principal offices and places of business in the Southern Division of the Eastern District of Michigan. Three are individuals, each residing within the Southern Division of the Eastern District of Michigan. The remaining four defendants are foreign corporations, respectively of the states of Ohio, Connecticut, Delaware, and Pennsylvania. None of the defendants are residents of the Northern Division of the Eastern District of Michigan. Neither do…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Shaw v. Quincy Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Southern Pacific Co. v. DentonSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  3. Smith v. LyonSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  4. MacOn Grocery Co. v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  5. McCormick Harvesting MacHine Co. v. WalthersSupreme Court of the United States · 1890

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Weiss v. York HospitalCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
  2. United States v. Victor Del ToroCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
  3. Weiss v. York HospitalCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
  4. Duval v. BathrickDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1940
  5. Guy F. Atkinson Company v. City of SeattleDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1958

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API