Gray v. Citizens Bank of Washington
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1ConcurrenceReilly, Senior Judge
Unlike my concurring colleague, I found no difficulty whatsoever in agreeing with Judge Farrell’s opinion holding that the dismissal of appellant-plaintiff’s complaint must be affirmed. This disposition was compelled by controlling precedent, including not only Adams v. George W. Cochran & Co., 597 A.2d 28 (D.C.1991), but also by Ivy v. Army Times Publishing Co., 428 A.2d 831 (D.C.1981) (en banc) and the cases cited in Hall v. Ford, 272 U.S.App.D.C. 301, 313, 856 F.2d 255, 267 (1988). I would have refrained from expressing my own views had it not been for Judge Schwelb’s separate opinion…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Geary v. United States Steel Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Sheets v. Teddy's Frosted Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Sydney O. Hall v. Claude A. FordCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1988
- Adams v. George W. Cochran & Co., Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
- Ivy v. Army Times Publishing Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1981
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.