Legal Opinion

People v. Willis

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 2, 1988PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the People’s timely disclosure of a complete but partially illegible photocopy of a Rosario statement did not deny him a fair trial (see, People v Rosario, 9 NY2d 286, cert denied 368 US 866). The statement, a police report of the victim’s description of the perpetrator, was delivered to the defense counsel prior to the trial and, although the flaw was obvious and easily rectifiable, the defense counsel made no attempt to obtain a clearer copy. In any event, the minutes of the reporting officer’s hearing testimony, during which he read the description…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. RosarioNew York Court of Appeals · 1961
  2. People v. RanghelleNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. People v. ConsolazioNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  4. People v. HambrickAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. WestAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  2. People v. BakerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  3. People v. GuyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API