Butell Robinson and Donald Robinson v. Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corporation, Edward R. Breedlove v. Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Per curiam
The district court concluded in a full opinion that Transcontinental was empowered to condemn a right of way under the applicable Georgia Condemnation statute, Ga.Laws, 1929, p. 219 et seq., Ga.Code Annot. § 36-201.1 (1969 Supp.); Botts v. Southeastern Pipeline Company, 190 Ga. 689, 700, 10 S.E.2d 375 (1940), although the Federal Power Commission had not issued a certificate of public convenience and necessity under the Natural Gas Act. 15 U.S.C.A. § 717f(c). We agree. The Georgia statute is a grant of the state power of eminent domain, separate and distinct from the federal power of eminent…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Botts v. Southeastern Pipe-Line Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1940
- Oakland Club v. South Carolina Public Service AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1940
3Cited by33 opinions
- Georgia Power Co. v. 54.20 Acres of LandCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
- Southern Natural Gas Co. v. PolandLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1980
- Harmon v. Phillips Petroleum Co.District Court, D. Montana · 1982
- Baird v. Sam Houston Electric Cooperative, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1981
- Dr. Don M. Smart v. Texas Power and Light CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.