Legal Opinion

McFall v. Simmons

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 7, 1900PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Application to this court for peremptory writ of mandamus by Daniel McFall against Tazewell M. Simmons, county judge. No briefs filed.

1Opinion of the CourtCorson, J.

This is a proceeding on an order to show cause why a peremptory writ of mandamus should not issue to the defendant, as judge of the county court of Beadle county, requiring him to hear and determine upon its merits a petition of the relator herein for the return to his custody of his two minor children, taken from him by an order of that court in August, 1898. The order to show cause is based upon an affidavit of the relator in which he states that he is the father of two minor children, namely, Maggie McFall and Charles McFall; that in August, 1898, the county court of Beadle county, on the…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Kol v. North Dakota Children's Home SocietyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Greenback v. DixonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
  3. In Re CrawfordSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1965
  4. In Re CrawfordSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1965
  5. In Re TindellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1955

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API