Legal Opinion

Cauefield v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York

District Court, E.D. Louisiana

Decided December 2, 1965No. Civ. A. Nos. 1806, 1807PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WEST, District Judge:

These cases, consolidated for trial, are before the Court on the motions of defendants, Fidelity and Casualty Company of New York and Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Company, to dismiss on the grounds of res judicata, judicial estoppel, and for lack of coverage under the policies of insurance issued by them to their respective assureds, Ernest Gremillion and Thomas Mobley. The motions pertaining to res judicata and judicial estoppel are based upon defendants’ contentions that this matter has been completely and thoroughly tried and adjudicated in the State Courts…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Williams v. MarionneauxSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1960
  2. California Company v. PriceSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1958
  3. Quarles v. LewisSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1954
  4. William Edward Roucher v. Traders & General Insurance Company, Dallas, TexasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1956
  5. Buillard v. DavisSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1936

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Sargent Cauefield and Jim Lucas v. The Fidelity and Casualty Company of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
  2. Schwegmann Bros. Giant Super Markets v. Louisiana Milk CommissionDistrict Court, M.D. Louisiana · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API