Legal Opinion

State v. Lechner

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided November 7, 1977No. CR 77-106PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Darrell Hickman, Justice.

The state brings this interlocutory appeal pursuant to Rules 16.2(d) and 36.10 of the Arkansas Rules of Criminal Procedure (1976). The issues raised concern the identity and credibility, or reliability, of two undisclosed informants whose “leads” served as the basis for the state’s search warrant. The three defendant-appellees were charged with possession and possession with intent to deliver controlled substances after various drugs were seized pursuant to this warrant. At a pretrial hearing the trial judge ordered the state to disclose the names of the two…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  4. United States v. VentrescaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. United States v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Beed v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980
  2. State v. GraddyOhio Supreme Court · 1978
  3. James v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1983
  4. Schneider v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980
  5. Valentine v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2019

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API