Legal Opinion

State v. Graddy

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 19, 1978No. 77-1074PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStephenson, J.

Two propositions of law are advanced in this court by the state to sustain the judgment of conviction. In substance, they are (1) that the search warrant was properly issued upon a sufficient showing of probable *134cause, and (2) sufficient evidence that the defendant possessed drugs with the intent to sell'them was presented in the trial court to support the jury verdict of guilty. We reach the second issue only in the event we sustain the state’s first proposition of law.

This court has previously enunciated the controlling legal principles that must be applied in a determination of the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  4. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  5. Draper v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. State v. CooeyOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  2. State v. RobertsOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  3. State v. KlostermanOhio Court of Appeals · 1996
  4. State v. Dibble (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
  5. State v. OK Sun BeanOhio Court of Appeals · 1983

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API