Legal Opinion

Braun v. Office of Management and Budget

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided March 20, 2018No. Civil Action No. 2017-1050Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA _______________________________ ) DAVID S. BRAUN, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civ. Action No. 17-1050 (EGS) ) OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND ) BUDGET, ) ) Defendant. ) ) MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff, David Steven Braun, alleges that defendant, Office of Management and Budget (“OMB”), must be compelled to “process and settle” four claims that Mr. Braun has submitted to federal agencies requesting various forms of relief. Mr. Braun asserts that such an order would be proper under the Barring Act, 31 U.S.C. § 3702(a)(4), which he submits requires…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Charles Kowal v. MCI Communications CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
  4. Dolly Kyle Browning and Direct Outstanding Creations Corporation v. William Jefferson ClintonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2002
  5. Atherton v. District of Columbia Office of the MayorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2009

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API