Legal Opinion
Hatchett v. Williams
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided January 9, 1969No. 15387PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PEDEN, Justice.
C. W. Williams filed this suit for damages against Corky’s Hong Kong Clothes, Inc., for breach of a contract whereby he was to be paid for supplying all the ready-to-wear clothing to be sold in the corporation’s Shreveport, Louisiana, store and against Robert L. Hatchett, Jr. for breach of his guaranty agreement in favor of Williams. A default judgment was entered against Corky’s Hong Kong Clothes, Inc. (which we will call Corky’s), and it has not filed an appeal. After a jury trial Hatchett has perfected this appeal from the judgment of the trial court in favor of Williams in…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Grace v. Orkin Exterminating Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1953
- Tooke Reynolds v. Bastrop Ice Storage Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1931
- EASTMAN OIL WELL SURVEY COMPANY v. HamilCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1967
- New Orleans Cigarette Serv. Corp. v. SicarelliLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1954
3Cited by7 opinions
- Amador Ramirez, Jr., Individually, as Administrator of the Estate of Ana Maria S. De Ramirez, Deceased v. Autobuses Blancos Flecha Roja, S.A. De C.V.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
- Continental Oil Co. v. P. P. G. IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1973
- Lipschutz v. Gordon Jewelry CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1974
- Continental Oil Co. v. General American Transportation Corp.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1976
- Associated Press v. BergerDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 1978
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.