Legal Opinion
Gendler v. All Pro Van Lines, Inc.
District Court, D. Arizona
Decided September 27, 2005No. CV 04-251 TUC DCBPublished
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
BURY, District Judge.
Pending before this Court is Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment. For the reasons set forth below, Defendant’s motion is granted. 1
I. INTRODUCTION
Defendant is and was an interstate motor carrier of household goods and personal property (a.k.a., a moving company), and operates under the authority of the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration of the United States Department of Transportation. In January of 2004, Plaintiffs contracted with Defendant for the shipment of Plaintiffs’ household goods and personal property from Florida to Arizona.
On January 22,…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adams Express Company v. CroningerSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Georgia, Florida & Alabama Railway Co. v. Blish Milling Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.