Legal Opinion
Mormak v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided September 20, 1990No. 725 C.D. 1990PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BYER, Judge.
Karen A. Mormak (claimant) appeals from an order of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review (UCBR) which determined she was ineligible for benefits because she occupied a “major nontenured policymaking or advisory position” with the Commonwealth and, therefore, is not entitled to benefits under the Unemployment Compensation Law, Act of December 5, 1936, Second Ex.Sess., P.L. (1937) 2897, as amended, 43 P.S. §§ 751-914. We affirm.
Claimant originally was employed by the Pennsylvania Insurance Department as executive director of the Catastrophic Loss Trust Fund (CAT Fund). As…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Taylor v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Estate of McGovern v. Commonwealth, State Employees' Retirement BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Peak v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Hogan Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
- Spicer v. Commonwealth, Department of Public WelfareCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Alpha Auto Sales, Inc. v. Department of State, Bureau of Professional & Occupational AffairsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Gioia v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Philadelphia Suburban Corp. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Singer v. Bureau of Professional & Occupational AffairsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Zerbe v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.