Legal Opinion

Knight v. Ed Bishop

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 29, 1957No. 34341PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

This action for damages arises out of a wrongful garnishment. The court entered findings of fact, conclusions of' law, and judgment in favor of the plaintiff. The defendants appeal.

Appellants do not assign error to the findings of fact. They therefore become the established facts of the case. Rule on Appeal 43, 34A Wn. (2d) 47, as amended, effective January 2, 1953.

The question is, do the findings support the judgment? In re Youngkin’s Estate, 48 Wn. (2d) 432, 294 P. (2d) 426 (1956); Union Electric & Plumbing Supply v. United Ass’n of Journeymen & Apprentices of the Plumbing & Pipe Fitting…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Maib v. Maryland Casualty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Olsen v. National Grocery Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1942
  3. In Re Youngkin's EstateWashington Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Union Electric & Plumbing Supply, Inc. v. United Ass'n of JourneymenWashington Supreme Court · 1954

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Goodman v. Bethel School District No. 403Washington Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Department of Social & Health Services v. GerlackCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API