Knight v. Ed Bishop
Washington Supreme Court
1Per curiam
This action for damages arises out of a wrongful garnishment. The court entered findings of fact, conclusions of' law, and judgment in favor of the plaintiff. The defendants appeal.
Appellants do not assign error to the findings of fact. They therefore become the established facts of the case. Rule on Appeal 43, 34A Wn. (2d) 47, as amended, effective January 2, 1953.
The question is, do the findings support the judgment? In re Youngkin’s Estate, 48 Wn. (2d) 432, 294 P. (2d) 426 (1956); Union Electric & Plumbing Supply v. United Ass’n of Journeymen & Apprentices of the Plumbing & Pipe Fitting…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Maib v. Maryland Casualty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1943
- Olsen v. National Grocery Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1942
- In Re Youngkin's EstateWashington Supreme Court · 1956
- Union Electric & Plumbing Supply, Inc. v. United Ass'n of JourneymenWashington Supreme Court · 1954
3Cited by2 opinions
- Goodman v. Bethel School District No. 403Washington Supreme Court · 1974
- Department of Social & Health Services v. GerlackCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1980