Legal Opinion

Cobb v. Taylor

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided December 14, 1892No. 15,967PublishedCited by 4 opinions

From the Wabash Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtMcBride, J.

The appellants assign twelve alleged errors. They have, however, failed to discuss any except the •first, and the others are, for that reason, waived. It is indeed questionable if there is any discussion of any question presented by the record. The first error assigned is that the court erred in overruling a demurrer to" the complaint. Counsel, assuming that the complaint proceeds upon a certain theory, cite authorities to show it bad. An examination of the complaint renders it clear that they have entirely misconceived its theory and scope, and neither the argument nor the authorities cited…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Haugh v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Ault v. ClarkIndiana Court of Appeals · 1916
  3. Alfred Shrimpton & Sons, Ltd. v. KeyesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1897
  4. Souers v. StahlIndiana Court of Appeals · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API