Legal Opinion
Foseco, Inc. v. Consolidated Aluminum Corp.
District Court, E.D. Missouri
Decided April 15, 1991No. 88-85 C (2)PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
851 F.Supp. 369 (1991)
FOSECO, INC., Plaintiff,
v.
CONSOLIDATED ALUMINUM CORPORATION, and Selee Corporation, Defendants.
No. 88-85 C (2).
United States District Court, E.D. Missouri, E.D.
April 15, 1991.
Jeffery J. Kalinowski, Partner, Peper and Martin, St. Louis, MO, for plaintiff.
Jonathan P. Soifer, Associate, Polster and Lieder, St. Louis, MO, for defendants.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
FILIPPINE, Chief Judge.
This matter is before the Court on defendants' motion for a separate trial on the issues of liability and damages and for an order staying discovery of the damages issue. They further ask the Court…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Ralston Purina Company v. Far-Mar-Co, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- Swofford v. B & W, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1963
- Tyler Refrigeration v. Kysor Industrial CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- Paine, Webber, Jackson & Curtis, Inc. v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1984
- Pacific Furniture Manufacturing Co. v. Preview Furniture Corporation, and Eli J. EhrlichCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Drennan v. Maryland Casualty Co.District Court, D. Nevada · 2005
- Cook v. United Services Automobile Ass'nDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1996