Legal Opinion · Dissent

Flowers v. Texas Alcoholic Beverage Commission

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 21, 1989No. 09-88-286 CVPublished

1DissentBurgess, Justice

At the onset, I disagree with the majority’s assessment that the original opinion, 777 S.W.2d 781 is still correct. That opinion was based on the premise that appellant failed to file a statement of facts, as noted by the court, when it stated at page 783: “In reality, we have nothing to review. ...” Now that we have a statement of facts, that prior opinion, while it reaches the same result of the majority in this opinion, can no longer be correct.

Aside from this trivial disagreement, I respectfully dissent to the affirmance. The test to be used in liquor license cases was set forth in State…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. PeelerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1947
  2. Texas Alcoholic Beverage Commission v. MikulenkaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1974
  3. Elliott v. DawsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1971
  4. Morton v. PlummerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1960
  5. Flowers v. Texas Alcoholic Beverage CommissionCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1989

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API