Flowers v. Texas Alcoholic Beverage Commission
Court of Appeals of Texas
1DissentBurgess, Justice
At the onset, I disagree with the majority’s assessment that the original opinion, 777 S.W.2d 781 is still correct. That opinion was based on the premise that appellant failed to file a statement of facts, as noted by the court, when it stated at page 783: “In reality, we have nothing to review. ...” Now that we have a statement of facts, that prior opinion, while it reaches the same result of the majority in this opinion, can no longer be correct.
Aside from this trivial disagreement, I respectfully dissent to the affirmance. The test to be used in liquor license cases was set forth in State…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. PeelerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1947
- Texas Alcoholic Beverage Commission v. MikulenkaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1974
- Elliott v. DawsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1971
- Morton v. PlummerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1960
- Flowers v. Texas Alcoholic Beverage CommissionCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1989
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.