Legal Opinion

Elliott v. Dawson

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 11, 1971No. 15798PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BELL, Chief Justice.

Raymond W. Dawson made application for an on-premises retail dealer’s license for beer and wine and County Judge Bill Elliott denied the application. He appealed to the district court and obtained a judgment granting his application for a beer and wine license. The main issue before us is whether the findings of the County Judge are reasonably supported by substantial evidence.

“The correctness of the order of the county judge, and consequently of the judgments of the district court and Court of Civil Appeals, is to be tested by the application of the substantial evidence…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Railroad Commission of Texas v. Shell Oil Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Trapp v. Shell Oil Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Jones v. MarshTexas Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Hawkins v. Texas Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1948
  5. State v. PeelerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1947

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Helms v. Texas Alcoholic Beverage, Commission, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1985
  2. Texas Alcoholic Beverage Commission v. MikulenkaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1974
  3. Dienst v. Texas Alcoholic Beverage CommissionCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1976
  4. In re the Simonton Gin, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1981
  5. Lindsay v. SterlingCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1984

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API