Legal Opinion

Pennsylvania R. v. Brubaker

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided April 12, 1929No. 5114PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HICKS, Circuit Judge.

This is a suit for personal injuries, controlled by the Federal Employers’ Liability Act. Act April 22, 1908, c. 149, § 1, 35 Stat. 65; title 45, c. 2, § 51, U. S. C. (45 USCA § 51). Plaintiff in error challenges the denial of its motion to direct a verdict. This is the only matter presented here.

Defendant in error, herein called plaintiff, was one of a crew of freight handlers, engaged in transferring a large and heavy crated electric motor from a freight car to the platform of a freight station. To accomplish this, plaintiff and his fellows had balanced the crate upon…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Cincinnati, N. O. & T. P. Ry. Co. v. South Pork Coal Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1905
  2. Southern Ry. Co. v. DerrCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1917

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Baltimore & O. R. Co. v. O'NeillCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1954
  2. Blair v. B. O. R.R. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  3. Baltimore & O. R. Co. v. O'NeillCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1954
  4. Blair v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API