Blair v. B. O. R.R. Co.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Plaintiff sued under the Federal Employers' Liability Act of April 22, 1908, c. 149, 35 Stat. 65, 45 USCA 51 et seq. After a trial in which he got a verdict, a new trial was granted, as the learned trial judge explained, because he had submitted to the jury defendant's liability for ". . . failure to provide adequate equipment for the work; failure to provide sufficient help, and carelessness of its employees . . ."; he stated that after reflection he had concluded that there was no evidence to support a finding of inadequate equipment or insufficient help and therefore a new trial was…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Guerierro v. Reading CompanySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
- Pennsylvania R. v. BrubakerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1929
- Detroit, G. H. & M. Ry. Co. v. MaldonadoCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1932
- Cacchione v. Hagan & Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1915
- Reusch v. GroetzingerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1899
3Cited by3 opinions
- Blair v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Schirra v. Delaware, L. & WR Co.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1952
- Cutler v. Peck Lumber Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944