Legal Opinion

Tradewell Stores, Inc. v. Snohomish County

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 22, 1966No. 38554PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Birdseye, J. †

The sole issue presented by this appeal is a question of law, the facts being undisputed.

Since midsummer of 1960, appellant has occupied a store building erected on a portion of Block 419, plat of Everett, Division “K,” in Snohomish County, under a lease which obligates it to pay the real-estate taxes levied on the property. The building was erected during the first half of 1960, and replaced several single-family residences that were removed from the land.

From January 1, 1960, to January 1, 1964, the real property was listed on the county’s assessment roles as having an…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Schuler v. ChapmanIllinois Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Lipsett Steel Products, Inc. v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Marshall Wells Co. v. Foster CountyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1930
  4. State v. Mortgage-Bond Co. of New YorkSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  5. Davidson v. Franklin Avenue Investment Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1915

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Sim v. Washington State Parks & Recreation CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Markham v. FriedlandDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1971
  3. Star Iron & Steel Co. v. Pierce CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1971
  4. County Board of Equalization v. Nupetco AssociatesUtah Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Municipality of Anchorage v. Alaska Distributors Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1986

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API