Legal Opinion

Garza v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided November 19, 1930No. 13670PublishedCited by 31 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

LATTIMORE, Judge.

— Conviction for possessing intoxicating liquor for purposes of sale; punishment, one year and six months in the penitentiary.

We find in the record three bills of exception. Bill No. 1 presents the appellant’s exception to the refusal of the trial court to quash- the indictment because, as set out at length, he insists that the special judge who presided at the term at which the indictment was returned, was not legally elected, and was therefore not qualified. We have examined the bill and also the testimony adduced upon the hearing of the motion to quash, and are of opinion…

2Cited by31 opinions

  1. State v. JordanCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2011
  2. Heredia v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1971
  3. Peltier v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
  4. Crider v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2011
  5. Sherlock v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1982

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API