Legal Opinion

In re Storsand

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided December 9, 1946No. 5207PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Jackson, Judge,

delivered tlie opinion of the court:

This is an appeal from a decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming that of the Primary Examiner rejecting as unpatentable over the patent to Allan, 1,702,924, February 19, 1929, all of the claims 10 to 18, inclusive, of an application for a patent for Bipolar Electrolyzers.

We were not favored with oral argument on behalf of appellant. His appeal was submitted on brief.

Claim 10 is illustrative of the subject matter in issue and reads as follows:

10. A bipolar electrolyzer having the combination of a group…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. General Electric Co. v. Wabash Appliance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. In re CarrCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1941
  3. In re LambCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1944

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Application of BisleyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1952
  2. Application of Cecil Boling and Alexander J. TiggesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API