McCluskey v. Trustees of Red Dot Corp. Employee Stock Ownership Plan
District Court, W.D. Washington
1Opinion of the Court
RICARDO S. MARTINEZ, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court for consideration of plaintiffs motion for class certification, which defendants have opposed. Dkt. # 25. Plaintiff has also moved to be named class representative, with appointment of his counsel as class counsel. The Court has fully considered the motions and the supporting and opposing memoranda. For the reasons set forth below, the motions shall be granted.
FACTUAL BACKGROUND
Plaintiff Richard McCluskey, a former employee of Red Dot Corporation (“Red Dot”), brings this action pursuant to the Employee Retirement Income…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Staton v. Boeing Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Ortiz v. Fibreboard Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
- William Harris v. Palm Springs Alpine Estates, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Saravia v. SessionsDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2017
- Corley v. Google, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2016
- Ogbuehi v. Comcast of California/Colorado/Florida/Oregon, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2014
- Torrezani v. VIP Auto Detailing, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2017
- Dunakin v. QuigleyDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2015
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.