Legal Opinion

Mosebach v. Jenness

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided March 7, 1961No. [No. 126, September Term, 1960.]PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHenderson, J.

This appeal is from a decree dismissing a bill to set aside two deeds whereby the title to the complainant’s 347-acre farm was conveyed to him and to one of the defendants, Mrs. Jenness, as joint tenants. The theory of the bill was that Mrs. Jenness and her husband had exercised undue influence or duress upon the grantor or, in the alternative, that they stood in a confidential relation to the grantor and that the transaction was unfair and unreasonable. There seems to be no dispute as to the applicable legal principles. The tests of undue influence are clearly stated in Tracey v. Tracey, 160…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Masius v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1957
  2. Brandenburg v. HarshmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1949
  3. Hoffman v. RickellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1948
  4. Lynn v. MagnessCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1948
  5. Tracey v. TraceyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1931

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Sanders v. SandersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1971
  2. Eyler v. SpencerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1966
  3. Doe v. Shady Grove Reproductive Science Center, P.C.District Court, D. Maryland · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API