Legal Opinion

Weicht v. Automobile Banking Corp.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 20, 1945No. Appeal, 196PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Dithrich, J.,

This appeal is brought by the plaintiff who commenced an action in assumpsit by causing a writ of foreign attachment to be issued. The writ was dissolved by the court below because the property sought to be attached was in the hands of the sheriff under a writ of de retorno habendo.

The defendant and appellee, a Delaware corporation, hereinafter called the corporation, instituted an action of replevin against the plaintiff to recover the possession of an automobile. Plaintiff filed his bond in the sum of $2000 and retained possession. The corporation was granted a rule…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bulkley v. EckertSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1846
  2. Braun, Sheriff, to Use of Louik v. DerosaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  3. Riley v. HirstSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1845

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Weicht v. Automobile Banking Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  2. Automobile Banking Corp. v. WeichtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  3. OSTROFF v. YaslykSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  4. General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. Burns, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Cumberland County1961
  5. OSTROFF v. YaslykSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1964

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API