Weicht v. Automobile Banking Corp.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Dithrich, J.,
This appeal is brought by the plaintiff who commenced an action in assumpsit by causing a writ of foreign attachment to be issued. The writ was dissolved by the court below because the property sought to be attached was in the hands of the sheriff under a writ of de retorno habendo.
The defendant and appellee, a Delaware corporation, hereinafter called the corporation, instituted an action of replevin against the plaintiff to recover the possession of an automobile. Plaintiff filed his bond in the sum of $2000 and retained possession. The corporation was granted a rule…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Bulkley v. EckertSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1846
- Braun, Sheriff, to Use of Louik v. DerosaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
- Riley v. HirstSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1845
3Cited by6 opinions
- Weicht v. Automobile Banking Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
- Automobile Banking Corp. v. WeichtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
- OSTROFF v. YaslykSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
- General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. Burns, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Cumberland County1961
- OSTROFF v. YaslykSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.