Klein v. Munson Steamship Line

Pee Cueiam.

To properly consider the unfortunate incident which has resulted in the above-entitled actions, it would be necessary to go into many details which are better left unwritten.

We have reached the conclusion, however, that because of the exclusion of important testimony, there must be a new trial of the action. Evidence offered to show plaintiff’s inclination to submit to an act of intercourse shortly before the assault complained of was competent and should have been received. This applies particularly to the testimony of the witness Solana called by the defendant.

In Ford v. Jones…