Legal Opinion

Pruitt v. MS RIGOLETTO

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided February 2, 1962No. 21150PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MACHROWICZ, District Judge.

Libelants are husband and wife. Two actions were instituted by them in this court. One was a civil action for damages to the husband as a result of an alleged injury while performing duties as a longshoreman on respondent’s vessel, the wife claiming damages for loss of consortium. This is the second action, in admiralty, an in rem proceeding as of this date, asserting like damages. The civil action was dismissed and in pressing their claims in the present suit libelants admit that this action arises out of a maritime tort and is to be governed by general maritime…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Southern Pacific Company v. JensenSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  2. The Tungus v. SkovgaardSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  3. Hitaffer v. Argonne Co., IncCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1950
  4. Smither and Company, Inc. v. Franciska T. ColesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1957
  5. Middleton v. Luckenbach S. S. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1934

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Peter Igneri and Theresa Igneri v. Cie. De Transports OceaniquesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
  2. Valitutto v. D/S I/D GaronneDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API