Legal Opinion

United States v. City of Buffalo

District Court, W.D. New York

Decided August 15, 1991No. CIV-73-414CPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CURTIN, District Judge.

Pending is the application of the attorneys for intervenor-plaintiffs Afro-American Police Association, et al. (“intervenors”), for attorneys’ fees and related expenses from defendant City of Buffalo (“City”). In support of the application, the intervenors have submitted affidavits with exhibits of Paul C. Saunders, Esq. (Items 355, 359), and of Richard T. Seymour, Esq. (Item 354). In opposition to the application, the City has filed two affidavits of Michael Risman, Esq., Senior Deputy Corporation Counsel (Items 358, 360).

There are several aspects to the application.…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Texas State Teachers Ass'n v. Garland Independent School DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Larry Nadeau v. Raymond A. Helgemoe, Warden, New Hampshire State PrisonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1978
  5. Hewitt v. HelmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Walker v. CoughlinDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1995
  2. Webster Greenthumb Co. v. Fulton County, Ga.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 2000
  3. Rehabilitation Ass'n of Virginia, Inc. v. MetcalfDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1998
  4. Berry v. New York State Department of Correctional ServicesDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1996
  5. Jackson v. CassellasDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API