Farley Thomas, III v. Clark County, et al.
District Court, D. Nevada
1Opinion
1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 4 * * * 5 Farley Thomas, III, Case No. 2:25-cv-00903-ART-DJA 6 Plaintiff, 7 Order v. 8 Clark County, et al., 9 Defendants. 10 11 Under
28 U.S.C. § 1915
Plaintiff is proceeding in this action pro se and has requested 12 authority to proceed in forma pauperis (meaning, without paying the filing fee). (ECF No. 7). 13 Plaintiff also submitted a complaint. (ECF No. 1-1). Because the Court finds that Plaintiff’s 14 application is complete, it grants the application to proceed in forma pauperis. The Court screens 15 Plaintiff’s complaint, dismisses…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- West v. AtkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.