Legal Opinion

West Texas Utilities Co. v. Huber

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided July 13, 1956No. 3249PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRISSOM, Chief Justice.

’ Huber recovered a judgment against the utility, cpmpany for breach of a contract to install a lighting . system that would properly illuminate his miniature • golf course. The company has appealed. The jury found that (14) it was agreed that “if the plaintiff was not satisfied with any lighting work or arrangements installed by defend-ánt, then the défendant would remove same without any charge to plaintiff for such equipment or work;” that (14-a) before plaintiff closed his golf course he did not unequivocally accept the lighting system as installed after knowing its…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Oltmanns Bros. v. PolandCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1911
  2. Nunn v. BrillhartTexas Commission of Appeals · 1922
  3. Magnolia Provision Co. v. ColemanTexas Commission of Appeals · 1928
  4. Harris County v. CharltonTexas Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Powers v. Sunylan Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1930

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bifano v. Young, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1983
  2. Vandergriff Chevrolet Co., Inc. v. Forum BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1981
  3. Lee-Emmert v. MacAtee, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1966
  4. Smith v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1989
  5. Bifano v. Young, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API