West Texas Utilities Co. v. Huber
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
GRISSOM, Chief Justice.
’ Huber recovered a judgment against the utility, cpmpany for breach of a contract to install a lighting . system that would properly illuminate his miniature • golf course. The company has appealed. The jury found that (14) it was agreed that “if the plaintiff was not satisfied with any lighting work or arrangements installed by defend-ánt, then the défendant would remove same without any charge to plaintiff for such equipment or work;” that (14-a) before plaintiff closed his golf course he did not unequivocally accept the lighting system as installed after knowing its…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Oltmanns Bros. v. PolandCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1911
- Nunn v. BrillhartTexas Commission of Appeals · 1922
- Magnolia Provision Co. v. ColemanTexas Commission of Appeals · 1928
- Harris County v. CharltonTexas Supreme Court · 1922
- Powers v. Sunylan Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1930
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Bifano v. Young, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1983
- Vandergriff Chevrolet Co., Inc. v. Forum BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1981
- Lee-Emmert v. MacAtee, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1966
- Smith v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1989
- Bifano v. Young, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1983