State v. Yanez
Supreme Court of Rhode Island
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GOLDBERG, Justice.
The principal issue presented by this ease is whether a reasonable mistake of fact concerning a complainant’s age may be asserted as a defense to a charge of statutory-rape. For the reasons articulated in this opinion, we hold that with respect to the age requirement first-degree child-molestation sexual assault is a strict-liability offense. Consequently a defendant charged with this offense may not introduce evidence that he or she was mistaken regarding the child’s age, nor is a defendant entitled to a jury instruction regarding the same. A recitation of the facts…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Morissette v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Snyder v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Dennis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Lambert v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- United States v. BalintSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Harris v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
- United States v. WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2008
- Brown v. StateSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2004
- State v. AponteSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2002
- Lee N. Mortenson v. National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, Pa.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.