Legal Opinion
Clarence A. Kolstad and Alta A. Kolstad v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 3, 1959No. 15871PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HAMLIN, Circuit Judge.
An action was commenced by the United States in the District Court for the District of Montana to condemn certain lands in connection with the Tiber Dam and Reservoir in north central Montana. Several different parcels of land were joined in the action. Parcels 10 and 11 were alleged to be owned by Clarence A. Kolstad and Alta A. Kol-stad, husband and wife. At the trial of the condemnation case before a jury, it developed from the testimony of appellant Clarence A. Kolstad that one portion of the property stood in his name alone, another portion of the property stood in…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Independence Lead Mines Co. v. KingsburyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1949
- Kahle v. Amtorg Trading Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1952
- Perrin v. Aluminum Co. Of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1952
- Gill v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1950
- Plaut v. MunfordCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1951
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Pierson v. PiersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1977
- Kolstad v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Montana · 1967
- Siberell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1959
- Leroy E. Becker Beverly A. Becker v. Stanely Cress Veral Tarno Craig Zanni Lisa Wampole Coos County, Leroy E. Becker Beverly A. Becker v. Stanley Cress Veral Tarno Craig Zanni Lisa Wampole Coos CountyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Siberell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1959