Legal Opinion

A. J. Armstrong Co. v. Romanach

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 9, 1964No. 63-720PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HORTON, Judge.

The appellant sued the appellees to recover on a promissory note allegedly endorsed by the appellees. The note had been executed by Mobile Units Manufacturing, Inc., and was secured by a chattel mortgage upon certain trucks. The note was payable in monthly installments commencing July 2, 1962. After two payments were made, the note became in default and this suit resulted. The appellees answered admitting the allegations of the complaint except to deny that they executed the note in the capacity of endorsers but on the contrary alleged they executed the same as guarantors. In…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wade v. ClowerSupreme Court of Florida · 1927
  2. State Ex Rel. Dos Anigos, Inc. v. LehmanSupreme Court of Florida · 1930
  3. State Ex Rel. Sherrill v. MilamSupreme Court of Florida · 1934

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Bedingfield v. BedingfieldDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
  2. Neale v. AycockDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1976
  3. Itt-Community Devel. Corp. v. Halifax Pav.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977
  4. Mendes v. Dowelanco Indus. LTDA.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
  5. Romanach v. A. J. Armstrong Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1965

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API