Legal Opinion
Romanach v. A. J. Armstrong Co.
Supreme Court of Florida
Decided March 3, 1965No. 33719PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ERVIN, Justice.
We have a petition for writ of ctertiorari to the District Court of Appeal, Third District, to review its decision in A. J. Armstrong Co., Inc., v. Romanach, 165 So.2d 817 (Fla.App.3rd 1964).
It appears from the opinion below that Mobile Units Manufacturing, Inc., executed a promissory note to respondent as payee to cover the purchase price of certain trucks and secured it by a chattel mortgage covering the trucks. Petitioners either endorsed or guaranteed the note. Upon failure of payment of the note, respondent sued petitioners, as endorsers, in the Circuit Court of Dade…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Malone v. MeresSupreme Court of Florida · 1926
- American Process Co. v. Florida White Pressed Brick Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1908
- Voges Motor Co. v. WardSupreme Court of Florida · 1929
- Baer v. G. M. A. Corp.Supreme Court of Florida · 1931
- Baer v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of Florida · 1931
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Bedingfield v. BedingfieldDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
- Mendes v. Dowelanco Indus. LTDA.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
- Mandell v. FortenberrySupreme Court of Florida · 1974
- A. J. Armstrong Co. v. RomanachDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1965