STATE BY & THROUGH DEPT., ETC. v. Richey Motor
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
WOLLMAN, Chief Justice.
This condemnation action is here on appeal for the second time. In the first appeal, we reversed and remanded for the purpose of allowing the State to amend the declaration of taking. State, Dept. of Transp. v. Richey Motor Co., 270 N.W.2d 48 (S.D.1978). Upon retrial, a jury returned a verdict in favor of defendants (who will be referred to collectively as “Richey”) in the amount of $77,000. The State appeals from the judgment entered on the verdict. Ri-chey appeals from an order denying a motion for reimbursement and a motion to correct the judgment. We affirm the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State Highway Commission v. Hayes EstateSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1966
- State Highway Commission v. MillerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1968
- State v. OlesenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1972
- Empey v. Rapid CitySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1960
- Nebraska Electric Generation & Transmission Coop., Inc. v. CadySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1976
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- City of Sioux Falls v. KelleySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
- Van Zee v. AssamSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
- Schimmel v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
- Holmes v. Wegman Oil Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
- Musch v. H-D Cooperative, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.