Legal Opinion
Sprint Corp. v. DeAngelo
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided June 30, 1998No. CIV. A. 98-2237-KHVPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
VRATIL, District Judge.
Sprint Corporation brings suit against its former employee, Dominick DeAngelo, claiming that he breached a contract of employment which contained a confidentiality agreement and covenant not to compete. On May 29,1998, Sprint filed its complaint, seeking to prohibit defendant from working for IXC Corporation pending a final decision in this case. The Court held a hearing on June 9, 1998, and took the matter under advisement. After fully considering the parties’ briefs, oral arguments, testimony at the hearing, and exhibits, the Court on June 20, 1998…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Reno v. American Civil Liberties UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Semmes Motors, Inc., Suing on Behalf of Itself and Together With Ford Dealers Alliance, Inc., Etc. v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
- Daryl B. Lundgrin v. W. Graham Claytor, Secretary of the Navy of the United States, and the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980
- Mabel Penn v. San Juan Hospital, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1975
- John B. Hull, Inc., the Sandmeyer Oil Company, Community Petroleum Products, Inc., and Dutchess Auto Co. v. Waterbury Petroleum Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Primedia Intertec Corp. v. Technology Marketing Corp.District Court, D. Kansas · 1998
- HotJobs.com, Ltd. v. Digital City, Inc.Fairfax County Circuit Court · 2000
- Kingma v. Snohomish County Corrections BureauDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2022