Legal Opinion

DeJonge v. Mutual of Enumclaw

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 7, 1990No. 86-0829; CA A61480PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDe Muniz, J.

This is a declaratory judgment action in which plaintiffs seek a determination that Mutual of Enumclaw (Mutual) is estopped to deny insurance coverage on a civil claim in which it was asserted that plaintiffs had negligently sold alcoholic beverages to a minor. A jury returned a verdict for plaintiffs. The trial court granted defendant’s motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict. Plaintiffs appeal from that judgment. We affirm.

Plaintiffs purchased a small grocery store in 1980. The previous owners had obtained their insurance from Keesecker, an independent insurance agent. Plaintiffs…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Payless Drug Stores Northwest v. BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Hill v. GrandeySupreme Court of Vermont · 1974
  3. Nowell v. Dawn-Leavitt Agency, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1980
  4. Hess v. SeegerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
  5. Manzer v. PenticoNebraska Supreme Court · 1981

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. DeJonge v. Mutual of EnumclawOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Hartford Insurance v. FranklinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1992
  3. DeJonge v. Mutual of EnumclawOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  4. DeJonge v. Mutual of EnumclawOregon Supreme Court · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API