Choctaw, Oklahoma & Gulf R. R. Co. v. Alexander
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
On Petition for Re-hearing.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the court by
McAtee, J.:
Very full and comprehensive briefs have been filed in this case upon the motion for re-hearing, ad dressed mainly to the proposition that the act of the legislature entitled “An act to regulate prairie fires,” (Statutes 1893, p. 597, ch. 38,) which was discussed and construed in the case upon its former consideration, (preceding opinion) and is now here again for dicussion, is ambiguous; that that portion of the eighth section of the act which reads, “Any railroad company operating any line in this Territory, shall be liable for all damages sustained by fire…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- McCluskey v. . CromwellNew York Court of Appeals · 1854
- Hadden v. CollectorSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
- United States v. FurlongSupreme Court of the United States · 1820
- Koch & Dryfus v. BridgesMississippi Supreme Court · 1871
- Fitzpatrick v. GebhartSupreme Court of Kansas · 1871
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Scott v. BrakelSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Linforth v. S.F. Gas and Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1909
- Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. CoachmanSupreme Court of Florida · 1910
- Schaff v. CoyleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
- Sunlight Carbon Co. v. St. Louis & S. F. R.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1926
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.