Legal Opinion

Neff v. Hindman

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided April 22, 1948No. Civil Action 6959PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GIBSON, District Judge.

The instant action had its origin in an automobile collision in this District. By the complaint it appears that plaintiffs were injured when their automobile was struck by another owned by the defendant, Philip W. Plindman, a resident of Pennsylvania, and driven by the defendant, Joseph David Hindman, Jr., a resident of Oklahoma.

The plaintiffs were residents of Ohio and the action was instituted in the district of which Philip W. Hindman was a resident. The defendant, Joseph David Hindman, Jr., was served under the procedure of Rule 2079 of the Pennsylvania Rules of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Knight v. West Jersey RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1885
  3. Peeples v. RamspacherDistrict Court, E.D. South Carolina · 1939
  4. Highway Steel & Manufacturing Co. v. KincannonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1939
  5. Lambert v. DoyleDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1947

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Pasternack v. DaloDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1955
  2. Karagiannis v. ShafferDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1951
  3. Greene v. GoodyearDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1953
  4. Rigutto v. Italian Terrazzo Mosaic Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1950
  5. Millican v. GeeDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1950

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API