Legal Opinion
State v. Mendoza
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided September 27, 1990No. 1 CA-CR 89-518PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
EHRLICH, Judge.
The defendant was convicted of driving while under the influence of intoxicating liquor (DUI) with two prior convictions, and driving with a blood-alcohol content of 0.10 or more with two prior convictions, class 5 felonies, in violation of A.R.S. §§ 28-692(A) and (B) and 28-692.01. The imposition of sentence was suspended and the defendant was placed on probation for three years. He was ordered to spend the minimum term of six months in prison. On appeal, he argues that:(1) his convictions must be reversed because the state failed to present any “relation-back” evidence…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Sandstrom v. MontanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Griffith v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- United States v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- MacKey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. MendozaArizona Supreme Court · 1992
- Williams v. ThudeCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1994
- State v. MendozaArizona Supreme Court · 1992