Legal Opinion

Travelers' Ins. v. Rabinowitz

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided January 9, 1935No. 2277PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CHESNUT, District Judge.

In tins case there is a motion to dismiss the bill of complaint in equity on the ground of lack of federal jurisdiction. The plaintiff’s bill seeks the cancellation of an ordinary life insurance policy because, as alleged, it was procured by material misrepresentations. The policy contains a two year incontestable clause. The face amount of the policy is exactly $3,000; and the point is made that the amount in controversy is therefore less than the jurisdictional amount required by the statute in cases of diverse citizenship, as here involved. The language of the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Healy v. RattaSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Barry v. EdmundsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  3. Thompson v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  4. Vance v. W. A. Vandercook Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
  5. Lee v. WatsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1864

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Dewar v. BrooksDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1936
  2. Corcoran v. Royal Development Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API