Legal Opinion
Photopaint Technologies, LLC v. Smartlens Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided June 13, 2002No. 01 Civ. 8877(WK)PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION & ORDER
WHITMAN KNAPP, Senior District Judge.
Petitioner Photopaint Technologies, LLC (“Photopaint”) moves this Court to confirm an arbitration award pursuant to 9 U.S.C. § 9. Respondents Smartlens Corporation (“Smartlens”) and Steven Hylen (“Hylen”) (hereinafter collectively the “Respondents”) oppose the confirmation of the arbitration award and cross-move to dismiss the petition underlying Photopaint’s motion, or in the álternative, for summary judgment, on the grounds that the petition is time-barred.
For the reasons that follow, we grant the Respondents’ cross-motion for summary…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Connecticut National Bank v. GermainSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Robinson v. Shell Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Holmberg v. ArmbrechtSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Florasynth, Inc. v. Alfred PickholzCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Photopaint Technologies, LLC v. Smartlens Corporation and Steven HylenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003